CHICAGO—The American Osteopathic Association (AOA) has filed a lawsuit challenging a restrictive American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) policy that unfairly limits opportunities for both internal medicine physicians and residency and fellowship training programs.
- ABIM’s policy restricts opportunity: It unfairly blocks qualified residents and fellows from pursuing board certification based on bias, not ability.
- Qualified directors are being sidelined: AOBIM-certified physicians, trained and approved under the same ACGME standards as their peers, are being stripped of their authority to verify residents’ and fellows’ training.
- Patients ultimately pay the price: By excluding DOs from key leadership roles, the policy exacerbates the nation’s physician shortage and reduces care access—especially in underserved areas where DOs have long played a vital role.
These obstacles and unnecessary barriers to bringing Americans quality healthcare occur at a time of ongoing physician burnout and the projected shortage of more than 86,000 physicians by 2026 identified by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC).
In addition, osteopathic medicine is experiencing remarkable growth. The AOA reports that the profession is comprised of more than 207,000 DOs and medical students, the largest number in its 150-year history. Almost 40,000 students are training at osteopathic medical schools, representing over 25% of all U.S. medical students. With a young workforce—nearly 70% of practicing DOs are under the age of 45—the profession is well positioned to help address the nation’s projected physician shortfall. DOs also hold influential roles across government, the military, NASA, major sports organizations and the past three U.S. presidential administrations.
The AOA’s legal action aims to restore fairness and ensure that all qualified program directors—whether certified by AOBIM or ABIM—can continue guiding residents and fellows toward the certification of their choice.
The American College of Osteopathic Internists (ACOI), one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, notes that when program directors are pushed aside for reasons unrelated to competence, patients lose access to the physicians they need. The organization believes internal medicine residents deserve fair, evidence-based pathways to board certification.